President Trump and Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVoss, are out to defund after-school, and free lunch programs; if their budget proposals are implemented by Congress. Irregardless of your politics, this is flat-out wrong. Education is a cornerstone of our society. Without a decent education, you might as well toss the cell phone in the trash, and go back to using stone tools. Yes, our liberal Western democracy was built on a public school education that allowed everyone an opportunity to be the best they can be. The trouble seems to be that an informed public is a danger to the Conservative agenda. If the goal of Trump and DeVoss is ultimately to dismantle our public school system, this is merely the tip of the iceberg in dumbing down our society to their advantage. DeVoss, in particular, is a big advocate of “school choice.” However, just what kind of choice do most of us have? I am a product of public school education myself. Our educational system may be far from perfect, but where is the path to success without it? Such blatant disregard for the least among us is a warning sign for us all. If you don’t believe it, just check out how DeVoss’s philosophy worked in Michigan, where she was scorned for being totally unqualified to provide any leadership in the field of education. She is not an educator herself. She was a lobbyist for school choice who zealously gave of her time and money to bring education in line with her Biblical worldview. Her efforts have actually contributed to more disarray in the Michigan public school system by advocating for unregulated school choice. This has led to restricting education in under-served urban areas which do not have the means to send their kids to suburban schools with better track records. School busing is an option that ran out more than two decades ago, and the only “charter schools” in the Detroit Metropolitan Area are abysmal. For example, Hope Academy; a charter high school serving the Grand River and Livernois areas for the past 20 years, has some of the lowest test scores in the state. This kind of blatant disregard toward the disadvantaged is reflected in such moves by those who would balance budgets on the back of social programs. Leaving the states to handle education alone will lead to even bigger discrepancies in opportunities for those in economically depressed areas. It is not all black and white, folks, and we know it in our of hearts. Back to the topic at hand… A member of Congress recently stated: “There is no evidence that feeding hungry children helps them do better in school.” Could it be that an empty belly might make a child work harder to get out of their circumstances? Reasoning like this will bankrupt us all morally. Of course, these proposed cuts to after-school, and lunch programs, have not been scrutinized by Congress as yet so I am not hear to proclaim the sky is falling. The simple fact that DeVoss and Trump are willing to try getting these cuts approved tells you something. I suppose the money saved can be put to better use. Perhaps it will be shifted over to national defense, or maybe help fund the Border Wall. I don’t know. Either way, what they seem to be saying is these programs are wasteful, and thereby, expendable. Public school education has been under scrutiny, and attack for some time now. Gov. Scott Baker went after the N.E.A. in Wisconsin as part of his “right to work” agenda in that state. Busting unions has been fashionable among Conservative politicians for generations in the name of fiscal restraint. Why? Because unions wield power to leverage businesses and government for concessions they pass along to their members. If education is such an important cornerstone of our society why is it not a priority to support programs that enhance the educational experience for all our citizens? When those who grew up attending the best private schools money can buy are in a position to dictate the future direction of education, perhaps there isn’t the perspective; nor the compassion, to realize how blessed they were.
Our country is being led in a protectionist direction by our current Executive-in-Chief and his advisors. Yes, he is delivering on his promises by building a wall on our southern border with Mexico, and by banning entry to people from 6 Muslim countries. The current Executive Order; excluding Iraq, went into effect this week. One question we can obviously ask is: Will this prevent further terrorist acts against the United States? However, there are more questions that can be asked; e.g. Will we be any safer once these measures are in effect? Just who should we be afraid of? And can we control terrorism within our borders by restricting the inflow of specific immigrants?
On April 19, 1995, Timothy McVeigh detonated a devastating home-made bomb at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City killing 168 people, and injuring another 600. This was the most significant act of terror within our shores until 911. Why should I mention this in lieu of our current situation? After all, these measures are being taken against people outside our borders, and Mc Veigh was a white American citizen whose motivation was entirely different. Or was it? His expressed intent was to inspire a revolt against the federal government. The reasons for his anger were the A.T.F. attacks against David Kouresh’s compound in Waco, Texas, and the siege at Ruby Ridge which led to the deaths of a U.S.Marshal, and the Perpetrator’s wife and son. These were his stated motives following his arrest and conviction. Surely, something had taken hold of Timothy McVeigh since his military days where he served in the U.S. Army during the Gulf War. Then again, he was reprimanded for purchasing and wearing a “White Power” shirt purchased at a Ku Klux Clan rally in response to black soldiers wearing “Black Power” T-shirts around his base. Clearly, Timothy McVeigh had a very polarized view of the world which is shared by many people today.
During Franklin D. Roosevelt’s 1932 inaugural address he stated: “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” His statement was primarily directed towards the difficult economic times we found ourselves in following The Crash of ’29. Contrast these words with those of President Trump during his inaugural address : “This American carnage stops right here and stops right now.” All I ask you to do is check your heart after reading each statement. For me, the former has a ring of truth to it while the latter statement seems very foreboding. Just what does the word ‘carnage’ evoke? Webster’s Dictionary defines carnage this way: “The killing of many people.” Yet, when you look at the context in which Mr. Trump uses the word, he is mainly referring to our economy. Certainly this exaggerated use of the word appealed to enough people to place him in the Presidency, but at what cost?
Now, we are going to build walls both literally and figuratively around our country, but just exactly what will this accomplish? I cannot answer this question, but I will put it out there for each and everyone’s examination. All I know is, when we build walls around us to ‘control’ the chaos we perceive to be ‘out there’, we are denying our own humanity by denying the humanity in other parts of the world. The United States is not the first nation to do so. Did not the Romans build Hadrian’s Wall to keep out the Picts? And, of course, there is The Great Wall of China first erected by the Qin Dynasty to ward off the ‘barbarians’ attacking their northern borders. These attempts at controlling the movements of peoples throughout history were done to keep those perceived as a threat at bay. But how did those walls work in staving off the forces of change in those societies? How did they create mutual understanding? As we now know from history’s lessons, walls cannot protect us from the ills of our own society. The Romans were finally overcome not only by competing interests in Europe, but their own decadence. The Chinese Dynasties were convulsed by various invasions; followed by periods of stagnation over the last two millenniums. If holding on to what we have is an effective strategy in meeting the challenges of the Global Economy and Terrorism, we are certainly heading in the right direction. These questions remain to be answered, however… How long can we hold on? Or are we simply afraid of our own shadows? Time will tell.
I am compelled to create this blog because of the direction politics is heading in our country. It is indisputable that the United States is looked upon as a great bastion of freedom and democracy amidst a world of strife and conflict. In this light, it seems we can continue to be looked upon for inspiration, or, we can become stuck in traditional ways of thinking and behaving. The latter could lead us to isolation and stagnation. The former will help us join with folks all around the globe who see the things we must address in order to adapt to a more crowded, interconnected, and ever more turbulent world. To do anything less is to bury our heads in the sand.
There is no doubt that the global economy has leveled the playing field worldwide. The ramifications on the U.S. economy have been significant. The fallout has created widespread discontent among the many who have been left behind by globalization.This is what this current election cycle has brought to light in a big way. People are angry, and feeling shut out of The American Dream.
The impact this has had on our society is very grave. From the coal mines of Appalachia, to the steel mills of Pittsburgh and Birmingham, and, yes, the car manufacturing plants of Detroit; the world economy has moved on. In the 50s, 60s, and 70s, families who made up the backbone of these industries became accustomed to living a middle class lifestyle, or, at least, a blue collar lifestyle. The substitute? A job at the world’s largest retailer, or perhaps some other low-paying service industry job. This is a dilemma that has left many scrambling to pay rent; bills; and cover their basic expenses while working two or even three jobs.
Meanwhile, the old adage: “The rich get richer” is even more apropos in a world where the elite 2% control 90% of the world’s wealth.Most of us are aware of the statement: “Too big to fail.” At the same time, many might ask where their ‘golden parachute’ was during the financial melt-down in 2008. Just what is being done to address the needs of Main Street America? This is the crux of the problem.
How do we address this serious imbalance in our society? This has become the major issue in this campaign. It is the source of the insurgency candidacies of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders. The latter claims we need a socialist revolution to improve access to education, adequate healthcare, and create more equitable income. Moderates advocate for increasing tax rates on the wealthy and closing tax loop-holes, but these tax breaks are considered “business incentives.” If they are removed, there will be more motivation for multi-national corporations to run away from our shores. Can we take such strategies to be genuine, or just more false political promises? This is the dilemma we are faced with…who to take seriously.
While these issues are legitimate concerns to be addressed in our society, there is another voice that seems to be drowning out all other debate. This is the voice of Donald Trump. He claims to know how to fix our problems, but, all we know so far, is that he is bombastic; crude; and aggressive. If this is where are political dialogue is heading in earnest, this country, and the world, quite frankly, is in serious trouble. Do we really care about how to fix are economy, and re-create The American Dream, or are we becoming spectators of another ‘reality’ T.V. show? If that makes you uncomfortable, so be it. It is a question that needs to be asked because the tone of the debate seems to be controlled by he who shouts loudest.
Unfortunately, there are many people who still cling to the idea that this is a dog-eat-dog world where everybody is responsible for their life’s outcome. It is an ingrained belief that fuels the fires of greed and avarice among us. To have or have not are the stark alternatives of this approach to life. If this way of thinking continues to predominate, where does that leave us “losers?” Are we at the mercy of some ‘savior’ to come and wave a magic wand to make everything right? It appears many are putting their faith in just such a savior during this election cycle. I also realize this is probably not going to change anybody’s mind because the people who buy into saviors are not going to read this.
Gaining an advantage over others by winning the game of life will not help our world become a better place. For every enterprising entrepreneur who takes advantage of free enterprise to get ahead, there are hundreds pushed aside. This works as long as there is plenty of room on the playing field. However, our economic system is now reaching the saturation point. We will all lose out in the long-run unless civility and compassion are re-introduced into our political dialogue. Suspicion of government based on the rugged individualism of the 19th Century frontier spirit went a long way in developing our modern society. It has been emulated across the globe since the post W.W. II Era. I also agree that bureaucratic inefficiency, waste, and corruption are endemic in our government. Super Pacs call the shots in the halls of Congress.
That does not mean it has to be this way. We need both free enterprise, and a responsive government that works for the benefit of our entire society. Government is not just a necessary evil. It created the most efficient interstate highway system in history under the Eisenhower administration. The Social Security tax created during F.D.R.s Administration supposedly created a safety net for ‘Average Joes’ like me by involuntarily putting something away for retirement. However, the Social Security system is under assault by those that claim it is no longer viable because of the National Debt. “I will never see any benefits from the Social Security system,” has become a mantra of the younger generations. If it is broken, I suspect ‘something’, ot ‘somebody’, is responsible for mismanaging the Fund. Money paid into the system should be available to all those who have their paychecks gleaned by the government. With interest, I might add. Anyone with half a brain can get my drift. There is a need to get government under control so it works for ALL Americans.
A democracy is only as responsible as the people populating it. We must learn to work together to create the world we want to see. Self-reliance made America great, but, it could also be our downfall.The “I-me-mine” mentality we have tried to impose on the world is obsolete. If we are going to make tomorrow brighter than today, we must learn to work with the global community; not against it. Tough talk and name-calling won’t get it done for me.